Data Monitor

CLUSTER DATA

A large collection of Emerging Market Data – indicators and indices:

Click on a region, scroll down or  go2EMMA press

 

SECTOR DATA

A selection of return, risk, impact & fun ‘methodology’:

Click on a section, scroll down or return to Content

 

FRONTIERS TECH STORY

  • Modeling marine microplastic emissions in Life Cycle Assessment: characterization factors for biodegradable polymers and their application in a textile case study

    IntroductionWith the continuous increase of plastics production, it is imperative to carefully examine their environmental profile through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, current LCA modeling is not considering the potential impacts of plastic emissions on the biosphere. To integrate plastic emissions into LCA, characterization factors are needed that commonly consist of three elements: a fate factor, an exposure factor, and an effect factor. In this context, fate factors quantify the distribution and longevity of plastics in the environment. Research on these fate factors is still limited, especially for biodegradable polymers. Hence, the main objective of this research was to determine the fate factors of biodegradable polymers [poly (lactic acid), poly (butylene succinate), and poly (ε-caprolactam)] based on primary experimental data for the marine environment.MethodsThe validity of former research is tested by comparing the degradation evolution of i. macro- and microplastic particles, ii. two different grades of the polymer, and iii. different temperature levels. The degradation data are obtained by monitoring the oxygen consumption over a period of six months in natural seawater. The determined degradation rates are combined with sedimentation, resuspension, and deep burial rates to obtain fate factors. These fate factors are used to develop polymer-specific characterization factors. The resulting characterization factors are tested in an LCA case study of a synthetic sports shirt made from biodegradable polymer fibers. It allows to assess the relative importance of microplastic impacts compared to other life cycle impacts.Results and discussionComparing the resulting specific surface degradation rates indicates that microplastic degradation rates could be overestimated when using macroplastic degradation data. Pertaining to the case study, the results show that the impact on ecosystem quality by microplastic emissions could account for up to 30% of the total endpoint category. Overall, this work aims to foster interdisciplinary collaboration to leverage the accuracy of LCA studies and thus provide guidance for novel material development.

BELIEVE IT OR NOT

What’s wrong with this picture..?

Sep’2020

go2em

 

Jun’2020

go2em

 

Jan’21

go2em

Dec’2020

go2em

 

Nov’2020

go2em

 

Nov’2020

Georgia on my mind: What do Tbilisi and Atlanta have in common..? Well: Georgia!

go2em

 

Wanted

Send us a link to what you think Ripley would endorse 🙂 or comment one of the above

Write Us